Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Politics: Penanti By-Election Results: What the outcome of Penanti by-election means

What the outcome of Penanti by-election means

KUALA LUMPUR, June 1 — The result was expected but not the voter turnout. As expected Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) candidate Dr Mansor Othman won the Penanti by-election after getting 6,052 votes, defeating three independent candidates – Aminah Abdullah, Nai Khan Ari and Kamarul Ramizu Idris with a majority of 5,558 votes. What was unexpected was the turnout at the end of the polling period which stood at only 46.15 per cent. Only 7,100 of the 15,384 voters came out to vote in the by-election – a sharp fall from the 82.1 per cent voter turnout recorded during the last general election. Many political analysts and party machinery were taken aback as they had expected a turnout of between 60 to 70 per cent, but instead it turned out to be “the lowest voter turnout in election history”. Political analyst Dr Sivamurugan Pandian of the Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) said the outcome showed that PKR hardcore supporters came out in full force to vote, confirming recent studies which suggested that both PKR and UMNO had between 30 to 35 percent hardcore support in the constituency. “Although it is not good for the election process (lower turnout) and PKR did not achieve the target voter turnout of between 65 to 70 per cent, the higher majority they got did indicate that their supporters came out in full force to vote as compared to the last general election,” he said.

Also, though the Barisan Nasional (BN) did not contest the by-election, it had to study and learn from it, such as how PKR could effectively mobilise their supporters to come out to vote and continue with their offensive campaigning, even when their main contender was not contesting. The BN decided not to contest the by-election because it felt that the vacancy was due to flippant reasons. “BN has to evaluate the strategy used by PKR, who managed to bring out their hardcore supporters in bigger numbers compared to before. During the last election, PKR had won the state seat partly due to the swing from the BN supporters to it, which gave Fairus (Mohammad Fairus Khairuddin), its candidate then, almost a 2,000 majority. In this election, however, it is clear that the votes were from their own hardcore supporters,” he said. Another political analyst, Dr Oh Ei Sun, said the outcome of the by-election was less meaningful as basically it was a walkover as the major opposing force did not take part. “To some degree there was a contest, but basically it’s a walkover. Both the Pakatan and BN can interpret it any way they want but basically it is meaningless,” he said. Dr Oh said PKR would interpret the winning in more ways while the BN could say the low turnout showed that the people were not in favour of such by-elections.

The only interesting point in this by-election, he said was that despite the three independent candidates losing their deposit, they still managed to garner a combined total of five per cent of the votes. “We thought that they were insignificant all this while, but they did manage to get some votes. This has raised some questions and showed that PKR needs to have better coordination between their national, state and local leaders and look at internal party sentiments,” he said. On the other hand, several political leaders, especially from BN argued that the high majority obtained by the PKR candidate could not be used as a yardstick as he had won it against independents. “In today’s politics, independents actually have no place, unless they are very much liked by the people. Independents by-large are politics of yesterday and if you win against them, it actually doesn’t mean anything,” said Penang Gerakan chairman Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan. – Article taken from Bernama 01/06/09 & pictures by TheNutGraph.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

POLITICS: My Support On.....








In Malaysia, every people have their own support towards their own political parties. But of course, by supporting your own political parties are based on their work or contribution towards the people or 'Rakyat'. Lately, we can hear a lot of political happenings in Malaysia. The most we hear in common (negative) were corruption, power grab as well as their comments on TV. For the positive side, maybe we could hear like the government giving land titles, free water etc. People vote for them as they hope or they can see the political parties would have contributed for the Rakyat and not for doing nothing.

My support of course would be in Pakatan Raykat. Why? This is because I can see changes being made by them especially in a few states after they won in the last general election. They are giving away free water, free land titles as well as many things that could benefit the people. For the past / previous Barisan Nasional, I found out that they did nothing and their party are now full of corruption and power grab. Lately we could see that the Perak State were in limbo because of the uninstitutional power grab by Barisan Nasional from Pakatan Rakyat. I've ask a lot of my Ipoh friends and they commented that a fresh state elections is the best way to solve the crisis.

Overall, they did a great job by fighting till the end for the rakyat and I don't see why we should be giving up for such a wonderful party. Keep it up Pakatan Rakyat. All the Way! :)

REFORMASI! BUBARKAN DUN PERAK! HIDUP PAKATAN RAKYAT! Rating: 5/5

POLITICS: Anwar : If I Were A PM.....


KUALA LUMPUR, May 26 — One way he would improve racial ties in Malaysia if he were prime minister, said opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, would be to stop awarding scholarships to the children of government ministers. Describing his experience when his eldest daughter Nurul Izzah — now Member of Parliament for Lembah Pantai in Kuala Lumpur — went to university, Anwar said he was told he needn’t pay her fees as she was “automatically” given a scholarship.

But Anwar, who was then deputy prime minister and finance minister, persisted and the university eventually accepted his payment. “This has to be stopped,” he said of the practice, which has angered families of poor Chinese and Indian students who qualified for assistance but did not receive it. Speaking at a lunch yesterday organised by the Foreign Correspondents Association of Singapore, Anwar touched on a variety of topics, including racial harmony, Malaysia’s New Economic Policy (NEP) and his long-time political foe, former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Lauding the efforts of Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, Anwar said the secretary-general of the DAP sets a good example of how to work with different races. “Here is a Chinese leader who talks about the Malay problem, the Indian problem,” he said. “If we do this, we will win every by-election and general election.”

Anwar was also sceptical about Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s pledge that the controversial NEP would be reviewed. The policy gives privileges in government contracts, jobs, business, property purchases and education to Malays, and has resulted in a lack of opportunities for the minority races. “He announced it here in Singapore, that he wants to dismantle the NEP, (but) nothing has happened since. You dismantle it in place of what?” asked Anwar. “Do you still continue the old ways of disbursing funds to selected companies and to your cronies?”
The opposition, on the other hand, outlined a plan several years ago to replace the NEP, said Anwar, one that would make Malaysia compete aggressively with economies like South Korea and Taiwan. On Mahathir, Anwar said the former prime minister performed “remarkably well” in terms of reforming the country. He pointed out that the elder statesman had risen to prominence, though he did not come from an influential political family. Anwar was heir apparent to Dr Mahathir until he was sacked in 1998 after being hit with sodomy and corruption charges. He served six years in jail for corruption but was later cleared of sodomy. The pair has been trading barbs over the years through the media.

Replying to a question on what he would say about Mahathir if he were writing his biography, Anwar said: “He had a very strong passion and desire to undertake necessary changes to make Malaysia great. I was persuaded to join (Umno) because of that.”
However, with time, Dr Mahathir became “too confident” and thought of Malaysia as his “own property”.“I believe Malaysia has to move on beyond not only Mahathir,” Anwar said, “but also beyond old, obsolete policies and parties such as Umno and BN.” — picked from an article The Malaysian Insider 26/5/09
_________________________________________________________

Comment: I like this posting because UMNO is too weak now for governing the whole country. We should vote for a change! :) Rating: 5/5